Friday, 27 January 2012

Wimps

In 1911, a weak Liberal Government forced through the Parliament Act, which effectively disempowered the House of Lords from any lasting control over legislation.  They did this by packing the Lords with new peers who understood that they were for the sole purpose of ensuring their own disempowerment.  It worked.

In 2012, a weak (in perhaps a different sense) Coalition Government has proved itself incapable of preventing the Royal Bank of Scotland’s remuneration committee from awarding their CEO a million pound bonus for failing to meet any of his objectives.  Osborne and his poodles whinge that ‘we don’t wish to intervene in the day-to-day operations of the Bank’ – oh, for ***k’s sake, why not?  We’re not asking you to man the tills.  As majority shareholder, you (via your tame UKFI subsidiary), can surely pack the remuneration committee with your own appointees – just like Lloyd George and Asquith did to the Lords – on the understanding that they may NOT approve ANY bonuses whatsoever.  What’s stopping you, Government?

I know two possible  answers.  Either it’s because you’re still in thrall to those powers-that-were, you still believe that discredited claim that we have to ‘reward talent’ or it’ll go elsewhere (though we don’t hear so much of that nowadays, perhaps because Hester has just sacked most of those people); or, more likely, it’s because you’re a bunch of gutless wimps. 

Tomorrow, I promise some trivia.

4 comments :

  1. I tend to the Alfred E. Neuman attitude to life when I'm unable to affect the outcome.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I expect both answers are right.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's as maybe but have a heart. The poor chap will be having to make do a bit himself, what with having to get another London pad, as Babs evidently now has the first one. It'll be the ski chalet that has to go soon if it keeps on this way. Maybe a summerhouse in the back garden (Oxfordshire) will have to suffice instead.
    We all have to make sacrifices in these hard times.
    We're all in this together.

    ReplyDelete