You may have noticed, from the TV or the newspapers or passing loudspeaker vans or sky-writing aeroplanes, that a certain football player has recently been revealed to be a bad role model for the nation's youth, due to the uncovering of certain behavioural shenanigans which have no place in a respectable blog such as this. The sin is deemed especially heinous by virtue of the fact that the person in question had hitherto been universally regarded as a good role model: sober, balanced, faithful loving husband, perfect father, etcetera etcetera etcetera. So youngsters who were previously motivated to emulate this laudable lifestyle will, we are told, be instantly converted to the belief that it is after all perfectly acceptable to play away from home/beat your wife/snort yard-long lines of cocaine or whatever the latest scandal might be.
And I think: hang on. A couple of things. Firstly, whilst all this was allegedly going on, who was holding this man up to be that paragon of virtue? Why, the very media who now vilify him as the spawn of Satan. So that wasn't very good journalism, was it? They are normally so good at unearthing wrongdoing where none exists, you'd think the real thing would be a doddle, wouldn't you? But it took them years. Secondly, have they ever met, spoken to or observed an actual teenager? And finally (all right, that's three), if they are so dismayed by these revelations and their perceived corrupting influence, er, why did they publish them?
Myself, I think this whole role model thing isn't what it's cracked up to be. I can't think of a single one I ever had. Heroes to be worshipped, certainly. Achievements to be aspired to. But people of whom I thought: 'I want to conduct my life like him'? Nah. But maybe that's just me.
Good point. I've racked my brains and can't think of a valid role model from my youth. Apart from James Bond but that was never really going to happen...
ReplyDeleteQuite agree. I'd like to be able to tell you about the time I saw Alan Knott (or could it have been Julian from The Famous Five?) writing con-trail messages. But it wouldn't be true. Nothing's perfect, is it?
ReplyDeleteI think they published them (the poor role model revelations) because they are more interested in making money than helping gullible kids through their teenage angst.
ReplyDeleteOr is that being unfair?
And I think they published them (the good role model revelations) because they are more interested in making money than helping gullible kids through their teenage angst.
Or is that being unfair?
Mine might have been a small piece of flotsam floating down-river through the day; seems to be what happened.
ReplyDelete