To Tate Modern, to view the Matisse ‘cut-outs’.
Also, in my case, to view Tate Modern from the inside. I’d spent many a happy lunch hour(ish)
admiring the Bankside Power Station, amongst many other attractions (St Paul’s,
the Cannon Street station San Gimignano-esque towers, many passing young girls)
from the riverfront platform of the Anchor, back in the late 70s when I worked
in a (thankfully) long-gone Seifert office block called New London Bridge House
on roughly the site of what is now the Shard (about which, externally, I love
everything except its location… but that’s another story).
Anyway, I’d never been inside Bankside Power Station before
yesterday. Not back then, obviously – it
was still generating pollution until 1981.
(I’d love to have seen that turbine hall full of humming oil turbines.) Frankly,
I was a bit disappointed. It’s all a bit
too organised, corporate – I like my museums and galleries to be intimate, a
bit chaotic, even tactile. Go to Burrell
in Glasgow, Lyme Regis, or (if you’re venturing to foreign parts) the Wilson
Museum in Narberth. I’m being churlish, I know – the scale of the
Tate Modern project is stupendous. But I
found myself people-watching rather than absorbing the art on roped-off
display. And I couldn’t find the
Rothkos. Bah! (Though a single stumbled-upon Bacon portrait
was sufficient compensation.)
And the Matisse?
Well, you have to admire the energy (although he did have a lot of
help), and the film of him carving the precise form out of the huge sheet of
coloured paper with a pair of scissors, like Michelangelo with his marble and
chisels, removing the irrelevant bits to expose the vision within, was
enthralling. But there were too few Davids,
too much wallpaper. Maybe a couple of
dozen images out of hundreds (the famous ones, obviously) jumped out and lodged
in my emotional memory. A small
exhibition of the few undoubted masterpieces, rather than hundreds of bits of
work-in-progress. Too much is too
little.
It was great to wander along the Bankside though, soaking up
the sights and the sounds. (Buskers
seem to be actively encouraged, except where they’re banned.) The
views across the river have evolved, mostly upwards (the Gherkin is now dwarfed
by the Cheesegrater, St Paul’s dwarfed by both – although it’s interesting how
the cathedral re-asserts itself the closer you get, across the wibbly-wobbly millennium
bridge).
A faint memory of an old cartoon: two old geezers leaning on
a gate, gazing across open fields. “I
remember when this was all Banks.”
It's years since I've been to any kind of Tate. I enjoyed your visit.
ReplyDeleteIsn't there a rather fabulous curly bridge somewhere near there though?