Pope Benedict chose to announce his resignation in
Latin. I can’t imagine that this was dictated
by precedent, nor that it was his own mischievous choice (though he does seem
to have a twinkle in his eye occasionally), nor even that he was instructed to
do so by God, because by permitting him to resign God has effectively informed
him that He no longer has confidence in his (Benedict’s) ability to be His (God’s)
representative on Earth … It does tell
you a lot of what you need to know about the RC Church, though.
[Sorry, this is partly prompted by my starting a long
overdue reread of Joseph Heller’s ‘God Knows’, the first person story of the
Biblical King David, a guaranteed laugh a page.
Sample quote: “Abraham dumbfounds me still for having performed with
apparent ease a feat of incredible difficulty.
He circumcised himself. Now this
is not an easy thing to do – try it sometime and see.”]
Sorry again, I digress.
I was reminded about Latin this morning when I found myself saying ‘tabula
rasa’, without thinking. It was in
connection with the opportunities presented by an uncultivated garden, and was
met with an appropriately blank stare. I
thought about it and realised that I often say “de facto”, or even “ipso facto”
in conversation, again without wondering for one moment whether my collocutor
knows what I mean. And we all use more
daily Latin than we imagine – think QED, RIP.
I have little Latin, because of how I was taught at
school. It was a subject at Southbourne
Prep School, before I was eleven, and I loved it. It was like a kind of mathematics – pure logically
constructed formulae without the noise of meaning. (It took me decades to understand that I could
have been a mathematician.) But when I went
on to the grammar school, that enthusiasm was methodically destroyed. It became about memorisation rather than
comprehension, vocabulary rather than structure. I was accused, by an idiotic teacher (Mr
Green, I think he was) of being little better than an idiot because I’d failed
to hand in a translation of some banal, irrelevant passage from the Gallic Wars or somewhere. I was expected to get O level, because I was
expected to become a lawyer (for which it was then a prerequisite, or ‘sine qua
non’). I failed the exam, twice, the
second time deliberately. Oh well,
another career path closed off. Factum
est.
Just to come back to my first paragraph, a couple of tags
gleaned from a quick trawl through pages 1801-1806 of my Chambers Dictionary: “crambe
repetita”, and “cucullis non facit monachum”.
Interpretations available on request, subject to admission of surrender.
Crambe repetita kills wretched schoolmasters, as I remember. I had to look up 'cucullis' in my trusty Latin dictionary, rebound in 1892 and handed on by my grandfather to my father, my sister and then me: I wasn't familiar with the phrase but I think it means 'the cowl doesn't make the monk. Rather nice - not written by an ancient Roman, I presume?
ReplyDeleteFor me, "God Knows" is one of the funniest books of the last century. Now, that would be a good one to read on a long flight...
ReplyDeleteI never had the Latin for the judgin' on account of it wasn't taught at my school.(I expect, because none of the teachers had it, either!)
I shamelessly googled those (not having done any latin at all). I like 'warmed-over cabbage' (stale repetitions).
ReplyDeleteI've never read it! Hopelessly ashamed of myself, I'll buy it forthwith.
ReplyDeleteSo is everyone recommending 'God Knows' as a good read? I have just finished 'Catch 22' and loathed it. Does this make me a philistine?
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed it, Liz, but I read it several decades ago. I hope God Knows is good, I've just ordered it.
ReplyDeleteNow look - you've made me order God Knows AND 2 others by Heller.
ReplyDeleteI do have Catch 22 in the "to re-read" pile beside the bed, but then I'm always asleep before I've read anything.
I suspect Catch-22 doesn't work over the age of about 25 (not being funny, Liz, but ...)
ReplyDeleteI read his next three novels and hated them, but had forgotten God Knows until it jumped out of the bookshelf the other day. I suspect it works better the older you are ...
'Catch-22' is one of those allegedly classic books that just didn't live up to expectations, but maybe I just read it 20 years too late.
ReplyDeleteIt appears that 'God Knows' is not currently available for Kindle. I shall have to see if the library has it next time I am in that neck of the woods.
For her birthday a few years ago, my Mum asked for a book about Latin translations and also one specifically about Latin poetry. She loved, loved, loved them and has read both about 3 times.
I thought 'Catch 22' was a book of its time. I hated it when I was a stuffy romantic teenager but last year I found it illuminating and sad.
ReplyDeleteNow searching charity shops for 'God Knows'.