Frances, in her heartfelt post here,
alludes to an essay she was made to write on this topic. I doubt it was preserved, so I’m taking the
liberty of writing my own version.
For a start, whoever said it was ‘golden’ (The Tremoloes, was it?) needs to be sent
back to school for an English lesson. Or
what was called, when I did O levels, ‘Use of English’. (Now there’s a subject ripe for revival, Ms
Morgan, are you listening?) If you had
to come up with an adjective to qualify silence, is that really the best
available?
Of course, it wasn’t ever meant to be descriptive, was
it? It was designed as a control
mechanism. Children would have been
processed into believing that gold equates to reward, therefore be silent and
you might be rewarded – probably by not being punished.
Next: there’s no such thing.
(I mean no disrespect to profoundly deaf people in saying this – some of
you are musicians, aren’t you?) Try and
find it; I might have done so about twice in my life, and it shocked me, until
I realised that there was a lot of noise still going on: my heart, my breath,
even my bloodstream.
Third and last: it’s sometimes used as a verb. To silence.
If I were into control mechanisms, this would be near the top of my
toolkit. As I’m not, it’s near the top
of my ‘misuse of English’ kit.
If it has a colour, it’s black.
No comments:
Post a Comment